who provides the best healthcare?

14/09/2010 by Patrick Keady.

The success of healthcare systems is often measured
in terms of quality, activity and cost. Compared with the
US, Germany and France, the NHS performs well. In
terms of GDP, we spend less.

However, things are less clear when we compare NHS
quality and activity. Statistics come to the fore. We
compare the NHS with the EU, north America and
Australasia. And we might be missing a trick.

Could it be that there are better healthcare systems
elsewhere in the World? Healthcare systems that
deliver more at less cost.

Take Japan for example. It stands at or near the top in
every comparative ranking of healthcare quality, activity
and cost.

Not alone is their healthy life expectancy 6% higher
than in the UK, they also have the best recovery rates
from just about all of the major diseases. Japan
leads the World in curing the diseases that
can be cured. Impressive.

The percentage of people dying from circulatory
diseases per 100,000, is 75% less than here. The
proportion of cardiac death is four times less. The birth
rate is 30% less and the proportion of the Japanese
population that is obese, is one seventh. Although the
percentage of daily smokers in Japan is higher -
30.3%, compared to 26% in the UK.

Cost control is one of the key drivers of Japan’s
success. It’s savings in the high-tech realm can be
awesome. An MRI scan of the neck region in Japan
routinely costs 9% of one in the US.

All 125 million residents have access to healthcare
services. The Japanese see a Doctor about three times
as often as people here in the UK, or those with
healthcare insurance in the US. The number of Nurses
per 1,000 people in Japan is less than in the UK : 7.8,
compared with 8.8 in the UK.

And they have almost three times as many hospital
beds per 1,000 people. The average hospital stay is
four times the US average. The Japanese get twice as
many prescriptions and three times as many MRI
scans.

And the cost of caring for every person living in Japan
is less than half that of caring for the 80% of Americans
with health insurance. Total expenditure is less
than in the UK too - 7.8% GDP versus 8.1%.

So what do you think?

Post your thoughts below.

Posted in Risk Management, Innovation, Creativity, Public Health, Safety, Health and, Governance, NHS, Strategy | Print | No Comments »