You are currently browsing the archives for the Risk Management category.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
- Creativity (4)
- Darzi (3)
- David Nicholson (4)
- Gas Street Works (2)
- Governance (19)
- Health and (20)
- Innovation (7)
- Legislation (10)
- NHS (32)
- NLP (1)
- Patient (20)
- Patrick Keady (16)
- Personal Development (9)
- Public Health (4)
- Recommended (7)
- Risk Management (9)
- Safety (24)
- Strategy (16)
- Uncategorized (8)
- Wembley (2)
- 08/10/2010: who's in charge ?
- 28/09/2010: our new statute book
- 21/09/2010: meeting White Paper opportunities
- 14/09/2010: who provides the best healthcare?
- 23/08/2010: corporate accountability - 21st September
- 22/08/2010: whistleblowing
- 20/08/2010: RCN and NHS managers
- 19/08/2010: only 4% of NHSLA cases go to court
- 29/07/2010: respond by 18th October !
- 15/05/2010: Yokoso Japan - health and healthcare
Independent Consultant
Archive for the Risk Management Category
our new statute book
28/09/2010 by Patrick Keady.
A new website featuring every UK law in full is now available for free.
Launched by The National Archives, you can now scrutinise 6.5 million laws documents in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. They are stored as PDF files.
“This is the public’s statute book,” said Lord McNally, minister of state and deputy leader of House of Lords.
legislation.gov.uk presents complex information in a clear and intuitive way. Lord McNally continued that the website is groundbreaking and that it puts democracy at the heart of legislation. The website makes a major contribution to the government’s transparency agenda.
The website replaces The Office of Public Sector Information and Statute Law websites.
Posted in NHS, Safety, Risk Management, Governance, Legislation, Health and, Patient, Strategy | Print | No Comments »
who provides the best healthcare?
14/09/2010 by Patrick Keady.
The success of healthcare systems is often measured
in terms of quality, activity and cost. Compared with the
US, Germany and France, the NHS performs well. In
terms of GDP, we spend less.
However, things are less clear when we compare NHS
quality and activity. Statistics come to the fore. We
compare the NHS with the EU, north America and
Australasia. And we might be missing a trick.
Could it be that there are better healthcare systems
elsewhere in the World? Healthcare systems that
deliver more at less cost.
Take Japan for example. It stands at or near the top in
every comparative ranking of healthcare quality, activity
and cost.
Not alone is their healthy life expectancy 6% higher
than in the UK, they also have the best recovery rates
from just about all of the major diseases. Japan
leads the World in curing the diseases that
can be cured. Impressive.
The percentage of people dying from circulatory
diseases per 100,000, is 75% less than here. The
proportion of cardiac death is four times less. The birth
rate is 30% less and the proportion of the Japanese
population that is obese, is one seventh. Although the
percentage of daily smokers in Japan is higher -
30.3%, compared to 26% in the UK.
Cost control is one of the key drivers of Japan’s
success. It’s savings in the high-tech realm can be
awesome. An MRI scan of the neck region in Japan
routinely costs 9% of one in the US.
All 125 million residents have access to healthcare
services. The Japanese see a Doctor about three times
as often as people here in the UK, or those with
healthcare insurance in the US. The number of Nurses
per 1,000 people in Japan is less than in the UK : 7.8,
compared with 8.8 in the UK.
And they have almost three times as many hospital
beds per 1,000 people. The average hospital stay is
four times the US average. The Japanese get twice as
many prescriptions and three times as many MRI
scans.
And the cost of caring for every person living in Japan
is less than half that of caring for the 80% of Americans
with health insurance. Total expenditure is less
than in the UK too - 7.8% GDP versus 8.1%.
So what do you think?
Post your thoughts below.
Posted in Risk Management, Innovation, Creativity, Public Health, Safety, Health and, Governance, NHS, Strategy | Print | No Comments »
only 4% of NHSLA cases go to court
19/08/2010 by Patrick Keady.
DH is retaining the NHSLA. But, read on. 60% of acute trusts, 31% of mental health and learning disability trusts, 70% of maternity services and no ambulance trusts were at levels 2 or 3 of NHSLA’s risk management standards in March of this year. Solicitors succeeding in clinical negligence claims bill up to £450 per hour, and a success fee of 100%. NHSLA secures the very best of the defence market for £205 an hour, and no success fees. But, DH is exploring opportunities for greater commercial involvement. NHSLA is relocating to offices in London and Harrogate.
Link to NHSLA’s annual report via ‘publications’ at www.betteroutcomes.org
Posted in Safety, Risk Management, NHS, Legislation, Patient, Health and | Print | No Comments »
NHS National Quality Board - interim report
15/04/2010 by Patrick Keady.
HSJ reported today that there is lack of information on the safety and effectiveness of much NHS care and that this has been spelled out in an interim report from members of the NHS National Quality Board.
One of the NHSs prevailing beliefs seems to be, that individuals will perform better and their organisations will flourish …. when we reward the behaviours that we seek … and punish the behaviours that we dislike. This approach works well for simple, routine, rule-based work.
But NHS workers undertake other types of work, where non-routine creative and conceptual capabilities are also required.
I believe that Quality in the NHS will improve significantly when PCTs and Trusts demonstrate to their staff, that they understand what it is that really motivates their employees - the motivation of making progress in their work, improving quality and the simple satisfaction of getting better at what matters.
We know that businesses with transcendent purposes survive and continue to deliver excellent services to their customers. Too bad that ICI, Boeing and some of the large banks focussed too much on targets, and too little on purpose.
NHS targets are good. They continue to challenge clinical teams and Trusts. They have played a key role in improving the NHS. But more and more we are seeing that targets, potent as they are, can be an insufficient impetus for NHS staff and organisations. They do not get everyone leaping out of bed in the morning and racing to the wards, patients homes, theatres and meetings …. to do deliver excellent patient care.
The BBC’s Panorama team discovered earlier this year, that Trusts were incorrectly assessing performance, potentially distorting their standing in the CQC’s Annual Health Check. 17 out of the 28 Trusts visited by the CQC in 2009, made incorrect assessments. Did Mid-Staffs and Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells focus too much on targets, and too little on purpose?
While much has been written on aspects of Quality in the NHS, I would like the outputs from the NHS Quality Board to be short and to the point. To focus on Quality outcomes from the perspectives of the Treasury/National Insurance contributors, patients and employees.
And while the NHS focuses on purpose, that its satisfied employees will be racing to the wards, peoples homes, theatres and meetings …. to continue doing what motivates them best - making progress in their work, improving quality and the simple satisfaction of getting better at what matters.
About Patrick Keady
Patrick helps NHS organisations make better decisions. A former NHS Director of Governance and Strategy, he received awards from the BMA and IOSH. Patrick is a Company Director, a Trustee at a Chartered professional body and Editorial Board member at a peer-reviewed Journal. For more information, click www.betteroutcomes.org
Posted in Risk Management, Innovation, Safety, NHS, Governance, Patient | Print | No Comments »
Fundamentals of Governance
19/01/2010 by Patrick Keady.
HSJs Fundamentals of Governance took place in London, late last year.
Click here to see my review of the Conference. For a .pdf, contact me via www.betteroutcomes.org
About Patrick Keady
Patrick helps NHS organisations make better decisions. A former NHS Director of Governance and Strategy, he received awards from the BMA and IOSH. Patrick is a Company Director, a Trustee at a Chartered professional body and Editorial Board member at a peer-reviewed Journal. For more information, click www.betteroutcomes.org
Posted in Patrick Keady, Risk Management, NHS, Governance, Legislation, Uncategorized | Print | No Comments »
Does the NHS need management consultants?
21/12/2009 by Patrick Keady.
Every week, I receive two or three phonecalls about assignments in NHS risk management, governance and safety. However, many of the proposed assignments would be a waste of NHS time and NHS money.
Earlier this year, a PCT asked me to lead on corporate governance, health & safety, risk management, information management, health records, complaints, claims, moving and handling and commissioning strategy.
I challenged the potential client to describe in a few short sentences, what they wanted me to achieve, and by when. They were unable to see or tell me what success might look like.
So, I offered them telephone coaching, free-of-charge. The PCT soon saw that my input would be very worthwhile in one discreet project, where my independent insight and skill-set was just right.
The project is mission-critical to the PCT. They were happy with my daily rates too ! And during the course of the phone conversations, the potential client identified in-house people that could lead on many of the other pieces of work.
NHS organisations need to clearly think about what they want to achieve, before contacting independent consultants.
About Patrick Keady
Patrick helps NHS organisations make better decisions. A former NHS Director of Governance and Strategy, he received awards from the BMA and IOSH. Patrick is a Company Director, a Trustee at a Chartered professional body and Editorial Board member at a peer-reviewed Journal. For more information, click www.betteroutcomes.org
Posted in Patrick Keady, Risk Management, Innovation, Safety, NHS, Patient, Governance, Health and | Print | No Comments »
What makes successful Organisations …….. successful ?
02/12/2009 by Patrick Keady.
Stephen Ramsden achieved so much at his NHS Foundation Trust. Just six weeks ago, the CQC rated Luton and Dunstable as the best acute trust in NHS East of England. HSJ reported today that he will be leaving the trust in the spring of 2010 after 12 years in the post.
And with 12 years as Chief Executive at his FT, he is a shining NHS example of what makes successful organisations …………successful.
Led by Jeff Immelt, CEO at General Electric, a study found one key trait that is common in all successful companies. Their managers stay in place for along time.
Staying in place for along time, gives them space to extend their abilities, to learn much more about their organisation, to develop the critical connections that make their organisations perform better.
This is what Stephen Ramsden did, as a Chief Executive at Luton and Dunstable. Medical staff become successful because they take similar speciality-specific steps to extend their abilities, to learn about their speciality and to develop critical connections.
Immelt also found the converse, asserting that ‘the places where we’ve churned people like reinsurance, are the places where you will find we’ve failed’. We’ve had examples in the NHS where people are ‘churned like reinsurance’.
We need more Stephen Ramsdens, not less!. And in turn, they need the support of their Boards, their employees, SHAs, Monitor, Governors and other key stakeholders.
Chief Executives need the time and space to get to know their organisations much better, to extent their personal abilities, to develop critical connections, to understand risks and how to manage them effectively.
And in return they will be better placed to ensure that their NHS organisations wrestle with the very real risks of escalating demand and constraining resources.
About Patrick Keady
Patrick helps NHS organisations make better decisions. A former NHS Director of Governance and Strategy, he received awards from the BMA and IOSH. Patrick is a Company Director, a Trustee at a Chartered professional body and Editorial Board member at a peer-reviewed Journal. For more information, click www.betteroutcomes.org
Posted in Safety, Risk Management, NHS, Governance, Patient, Strategy | Print | No Comments »
Mike O’Brien to “name and shame”
12/11/2009 by Patrick Keady.
One of the headlines on www.hsj.co.uk today, caught my eye. Managers anger at O’Brien’s name and shame threat. And then it began to make sense. Mike O’Brien and David Nicholson seem to be speaking the same language!
In each year since 2000, Mike O’Brien and his colleagues in the Blair/Brown Governments, increased their funding of the NHS in England by almost 7% (on average).
And now we are preparing for annual funding increases that will be much closer to 0%. David Nicholson told us earlier this year that the NHS needs to find £15bn-£20bn of savings by 2014. The NHS has two options.
The first is to hit the target and miss the point.
By reducing inputs - cutting staff, closing buildings and increasing waiting lists. Its refreshing that Mike O’Brien does not want to see budgets and services slashed in response to the public sector funding squeeze.
Hitting the target and missing the point would be costly. Patients would not be interested in why NHS services were being cut. They would not want explanations as to why there were less staff on-duty.
Patients expect a return on their investment - for the National Insurance Contributions that they have and/or are making. And my guess is that patients will continue to expect better healthcare.
The second option is to hit the target …. and to hit the point.
By reducing waste in core processes, such as diagnosing, treating, and communicating with patients. By getting the care of patients right first time. By reducing unnecessary readmissions.
By ensuring that clinicians and managers feel empowered to achieve results, to make changes, to take decisions, to drive service improvement, to actively deal with risk.
The NHS is likely to reduce waste in core processes, when Directors of Finance and their colleagues become even more actively involved in process improvement and removing waste. When they continue allocating serious investment in the development of improvement capability. By continuing to focus on cost per unit, and not expecting increased funding from the Government or elsewhere.
My guess is that Mike O’Brien will not ‘name and shame’. Because the NHS will actively work to reduce waste in its core processes. And that the NHS will find the £15-£20bn of savings by 2014. And because Mike O’Brien and David Nicholson will continue to speak the same language.
Posted in Innovation, Creativity, Risk Management, Patrick Keady, NHS, David Nicholson, Strategy | Print | No Comments »
Innovation and Creativity
17/07/2009 by Patrick Keady.
Listening to Evan Davis on BBC Radio 4, I was particularly interested in the language of his guests.
James Dyson introduced himself as the founder of vacuum cleaners that work better.
Marta Lane Fox, recently appointed Champion of Digital Inclusion, is working to make life better for the six million economically and socially disadvantaged people in the UK that have no access to technology.
And Adrian Ringrose the chief executive of a company that enables public sector organisations do what they do, by doing all the bits that these organisations don’t want to think about.
When introducing ourselves in the NHS, we tend to use different language. And this episode of BBC Radio 4’s The Bottom Line promised a lot. It was a discussion about creativity and innovation.
To be good at innovation and creativity, Martha Lane Fox said that boldness and self-confidence works for her. James Dyson added that innovation for him is caring about solving problems and taking little incremental steps to get there.
And Adrian Ringrose gave his insight into the public sector. He suggested that it is more important to do what we do in the public sector - by the rules, rather than focusing on the end game.
A generalisation perhaps, he reminded us that it is the end point that matters and we are more likely to get there by building on our mistakes.
And my guess is that this point resonates with you and many leaders in NHS risk management, governance and safety. I enjoyed this edition of BBC Radio 4’s The Bottom Line and I know that you will too.
Posted in Risk Management, Innovation, Creativity, Patrick Keady, NHS, Personal Development, Governance, Strategy | Print | No Comments »